Experts and Business Leaders Share Insights in Favor of the Star Schema: A Techronicler Roundup
The Star Schema, when compared with the Snowflake Schema, received some overwhelming support from experts and business leaders. Here’s a roundup of insights that favor the Star Schema and present convincing arguments for the choice.
Don’t forget to read these Techronicler articles on the Star and Snowflake schemas, outlining how each schema fits in as the perfect data warehousing solution for specific scenarios and business goals related to analytics and insights.
Techronicler’s Favorite Insights in Favor of the Star Schema
Matt Little
In our business, where we manage a diverse range of lighting products and interact with customers through various sales channels, the way we organize and access our data is crucial. We needed a reliable and efficient system to handle the complex data associated with our inventory and sales operations. After careful consideration, we implemented the Star schema because it best aligned with our need for speed, simplicity, and accessibility.
During high-demand periods, such as Black Friday or Christmas, we’re not just looking at overall sales numbers—we’re drilling down into how individual products are performing across different regions, how quickly inventory is depleting, and which marketing campaigns are driving conversions. The Star schema’s design, with a central fact table surrounded by dimension tables, allows us to retrieve this data quickly and easily. The fewer joins required in this schema mean that our queries run faster, which is critical when we’re making decisions on restocking or adjusting our marketing strategy in real-time.
For example, last holiday season, we noticed a sudden spike in demand for a particular type of outdoor lighting. With the Star schema, we were able to quickly pull up data that showed us which regions were driving this surge, how much inventory we had left, and what our shipping times looked like. This allowed us to make an informed decision to expedite additional stock to those regions and adjust our advertising to capitalize on the trend. The ability to access and act on this data quickly gave us a competitive edge and ensured we didn’t miss out on potential sales.
Another big advantage of the Star schema at Festoon House is how accessible it is for all members of our team. Our sales, marketing, and inventory teams all rely on data to guide their decisions, but not everyone has a deep technical background. The Star schema’s straightforward and intuitive design makes it easier for these team members to navigate the database, run their own queries, and generate reports without having to wait for help from our IT department. This not only empowers our teams to be more self-sufficient but also reduces the bottlenecks that can occur when all data requests have to go through a central point of contact. The result is a more agile and responsive organization where data-driven decisions are made quickly and confidently.
Matt Little
Founder and Managing Director, Festoon House
Sandra Malouf
Structure: In a star schema, a central fact table is connected directly to multiple-dimension tables, which aren’t normalized (i.e., the dimensions are de-normalized).
Simplicity: Dimension tables are generally kept simple and flat.
Performance: Faster query performance due to fewer joins since the dimensions are not normalized.
Best For: Situations where simplicity and query performance are prioritized. It works well for:
– Simple and straight-forward reporting.
– Small to medium-sized databases.
– Scenarios with a focus on minimizing joins and improving query speed.
Pros:
Simpler and easier to understand.
Faster for read-heavy workloads due to fewer joins.
Cons:
Redundant data in dimension tables leads to larger storage requirements.
Harder to maintain when dimension tables grow large and complex.
Use Case: If you have a small to moderately large dataset with relatively simple relationships between facts and dimensions (e.g., sales transactions with dimensions like customer, product, and date), the star schema would work well due to its simplicity and performance.
Sandra Malouf
President, Eurolog Packing Group
Mark Wei
There isn’t one correct answer here, but as someone who juggles a lot of real-time data, I’m going to have to go with Star.
For a business that lives and dies by real-time analytics, the Star schema is hands-down the superior choice over the Snowflake schema.
When every second counts, you can’t afford to get bogged down by complex table joins and slow query performance. The Star schema’s denormalized structure is tailor-made for lightning-fast aggregations and ad-hoc analysis. By flattening the data into a central fact table surrounded by dimensional tables, you can slice and dice the data to your heart’s content without worrying about costly performance penalties.
Imagine being able to instantly see how a flash sale is performing across different product lines, customer segments, and regions. With a Star schema, that kind of granular, real-time insight is at your fingertips. You can spot trends, identify opportunities, and pivot your strategy on a dime to capitalize on changing market conditions.
In contrast, the Snowflake schema’s normalized structure would be a nightmare in this scenario. You’d have to join a dizzying array of tables just to answer basic business questions, leading to slower load times and frustrated users. And forget about real-time analysis – by the time you’ve wrangled the data into shape, the opportunity may have already passed you by.
Some might argue that the Snowflake schema is more “correct” from a data modeling perspective, as it eliminates redundancy and enforces consistency. But in the world of big data, sometimes you have to break the rules to deliver results. The Star schema’s denormalized approach may not be as elegant, but it gets the job done where it matters most: putting actionable insights into the hands of decision-makers.
Of course, implementing a Star schema isn’t as easy as 1-2-3. It requires careful planning to ensure the dimension tables are designed for maximum flexibility and the ETL processes can handle the data volumes involved. But with the right tools and expertise, these challenges are surmountable.
Mark Wei
Big Data Expert & Co-founder, PropertySensor
Michael Collins
Basically, in data warehousing, the selection between a Star schema and a Snowflake schema depends upon the requirements of a particular business and its size. Assuming there is any business that must experience fast query performances because of high user traffic, and at the same time, it requires simplifying its business intelligence reporting, I would recommend using the Star schema.
Advantages of Star Schema:
Simplicity: The general architecture of the Star schema is simpler, having fewer joins and hence easier query logic. This simplicity means faster retrieval of data, something that becomes critical for those businesses relying on rapid querying to inform their decision-making.
Performance: The Star schema has denormalized tables; hence, the performance of queries is improved. With fewer joins, access to data required is faster; thus, it is ideal for those environments where speed is critical.
Ease of Use: The Star schema provides an easier-to-understand model for users who are not deeply versed in SQL or technical database structures. This is especially useful in organizations where IT resources are limited and business users must access the data directly.
While the Snowflake schema is pretty good-mostly with regards to storage efficiency and data integrity due to normalization-the advantages of the Star schema in terms of query performance, simplicity, and ease of use make the latter more desirable for businesses where fast data access and simplicity in reporting are key.
Adhip Ray
Based on my experience working with data-driven companies, I typically lean toward the Star Schema for businesses focused on faster query performance and simpler design.
In scenarios where speed is critical—such as real-time reporting or data visualization for high-traffic platforms—the Star Schema has a clear advantage. Its flattened structure reduces the number of joins in queries, which means faster execution times. This simplicity also makes it easier for non-technical teams, such as marketing and sales, to work with the data directly, fostering a more agile, data-driven decision-making process.
However, if data redundancy is a concern and the business is handling more complex, normalized data sets, a Snowflake Schema could be a better fit. But in fast-paced environments, the Star Schema strikes a better balance between performance and usability.
Adhip Ray
Founder, WinSavvy
Daniel Brown
The correct schema for a data warehouse-whether Star or Snowflake-can make all the difference in today’s data-driven business world as far as analytics and operational efficiency go. In a scenario where the highest query performance and efficient reporting are required, the Star schema proves to be very handy.
Why Star Schema?
Improved Performance: The Star schema has a fact table at the center, around which dimension tables are placed. This reduces the number of joins that will be executed while querying data. Simplicity ensures fast query performance necessary for high-demand and fast decision-making environments.
The Star schema design is rather straightforward.
Simplicity in Design: The Star schema is easy; thus, it is less complicated to comprehend and use than a Snowflake schema. As a result, it can be useful for those companies who don’t have as many technical workers on their payroll. It is much easier for the users to retrieve information without going through complicated table relationships.
Optimal for Reporting: In the Star schema, the direct relationships between the fact table and each dimension make it much easier to report and create dashboards. This setting can bear a wide range of queries apart from being friendlier to Business Intelligence tools.
While the Snowflake schema has its own merits, mainly in data redundancy management and storage, that of the Star schema stands out because its ability to quickly make large volumes of data available with minimal processing makes it superior for high-performance and ease-of-use scenarios.
Daniel Brown
CEO, Handy Cleaners
Raimonds Lauzums
When designing a data warehouse for a rapidly growing e-commerce business that needs quick decision-making, I recommend the Star schema over the Snowflake schema. In this scenario, speed and simplicity are paramount, as the business relies on fast, high-level insights to adapt to market demands. The Star schema excels here because of its straightforward structure, with denormalized data, making query execution faster and easier to understand.
One distinct advantage of the Star schema is its ability to handle large volumes of queries in real-time, which is essential for a business constantly analyzing customer behaviors, trends, and sales performance. While the Snowflake schema offers better data normalization and storage efficiency, the Star schema’s simplicity is its greatest strength—empowering analysts and decision-makers to access critical data quickly without diving into complex joins.
In fast-paced environments, clarity and speed often outweigh optimization. With the Star schema, the business can focus on growth, agility, and immediate action.
Raimonds Lauzums
CEO, Poggers
Larry Hartman
When it comes to schema choice, for a business scenario dealing with fast query performance and simplicity, I would lean toward the Star Schema.
The key advantage of the Star Schema is its simplicity and ease of use, especially when optimizing for business intelligence tools that need to quickly aggregate data. Its denormalized structure means fewer joins, which leads to faster queries and better overall performance. In a scenario like sales reporting, where speed is critical, the Star Schema is ideal for real-time analytics without getting bogged down in complex joins.
The Snowflake Schema can add more depth, but the simplicity of Star helps streamline reporting and improves usability for non-technical team members.
Larry Hartman
Chief Strategic Officer, Pixel Free Studio
Bao Tran
I’m Bao Tran, a patent attorney with a background in leveraging data architecture to streamline workflows at PatentPC. When it comes to choosing between the Star and Snowflake schemas, I would lean toward the Star schema for a scenario where query speed and simplicity are critical, such as real-time business reporting for a mid-sized company.
The Star schema’s denormalized structure makes it easier for business users to access data quickly without needing to deal with complex joins. This simplicity can lead to faster query times, which is essential for real-time dashboards and reporting. In contrast, while the Snowflake schema is more normalized and reduces redundancy, it often requires more intricate joins that could slow down performance—making it less ideal for scenarios requiring rapid data insights.
For example, we once used a Star schema for a patent data analysis tool, which needed fast access to large sets of information across various fields. The schema’s structure allowed us to deliver efficient reporting without performance lags.
Bao Tran
Patent Attorney, PatentPC
The Techronicler team thanks these experts and business leaders for taking the time to share their opinions and present their case in favor of the Star Schema!
Connected Posts:
Star Schema vs Snowflake Schema: Building a Case in Favor of the Snowflake Schema
Star Schema vs Snowflake Schema: Building a Case in Favor of the Star Schema
If you wish to showcase your experience and expertise, participate in industry-leading discussions, and add visibility and impact to your personal brand and business, get in touch with the Techronicler team to feature in our fast-growing publication.
You may also like
